Proskauer

Representative Matters

• Rhode Island Hospital v. ProThera Biologics, Inc. et al. (R.I. Super. Ct.): Representing Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Baxalta US as lead counsel in a commercial dispute.
• SoClean, Inc. v. Philips (D. Mass.): Lead counsel representing SoClean in a commercial dispute against Philips following the recall of millions of CPAP and ventilator devices.
• In re SoClean, Inc., Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation (MDL): Lead counsel representing SoClean in multiple class action matters.
• 3B Medical v. SoClean, Inc. (S.D.N.Y.): Obtained a dismissal with prejudice on behalf of SoClean in a false advertising matter.
• Jackson v. NuVasive Inc. (D. Del.): Lead counsel representing NuVasive in a patent infringement dispute.
• Andes Capital Financing LLC v. Crossed Keys LLC et al. (D. Kan.): Lead counsel representing Defendants in breach of contract dispute.
• MediaZam LLC v. Voices.com (E.D. Wisc.): Lead counsel representing Voices.com against allegations of patent infringement.
• Hypertherm, Inc. v. Jack & Dave (D.N.H.): Obtained consent judgment and injunctive relief for Hypertherm in patent infringement dispute.
• Obtained 8-figure settlement in a confidential arbitration relating to pharmaceutical drug development.
• Andes Capital Financing LLC v. Crossed Keys LLC et al. (N.D. Tex.): Obtained dismissal for defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction following an evidentiary hearing.
• GEMAK v. Church & Dwight (D. Del.): Successfully resolved patent infringement dispute for Church & Dwight after winning motion to compel test results.
• Away v. Olivet et al. (S.D.N.Y.): Obtained successful resolution as lead counsel for Away in a case involving claims of trade secret misappropriation and trade dress infringement.
• Rothschild Digital Confirmation v. Oracle (E.D. Tex.): Won award of legal fees as lead counsel for Oracle in patent infringement dispute.
• Script Security Solutions v. Canary Connect (E.D. Tex.): Obtained early settlement for Canary as lead counsel in patent infringement dispute.
• DRG International v. Bachem Americas et al. (C.D. Cal.): Negotiated the dismissal of 5 of 7 asserted patents without motion practice and won a motion to dismiss claims of indirect and willful infringement.
• Ultratech, Inc. v. Analog Devices, Inc. (N.D. Cal.): Argued and won motion to dismiss action for copyright infringement.
• Zenith Elecs. LLC et al. v. Sceptre, Inc. (C.D. Cal.): Argued and defeated summary judgment motion on damages under 35 U.S.C. § 287; the case settled following the decision.
• SpeedTrack v. Amazon.com et al. (N.D. Cal.): Negotiated the dismissal of patent infringement claims against six clients without responding to complaint.
• SpeedTrack v. Office Depot, Inc. et al. (N.D. Cal., Fed. Cir.): Obtained summary judgment of non-infringement on behalf of all defendants under the Kessler doctrine; affirmed by the Federal Circuit on appeal.
• Speedtrack v. Wal-Mart (N.D. Cal., Fed. Cir.): Won summary judgment of non-infringement with respect to all asserted claims on behalf of defendants in a case relating to search algorithms used for online retail Web sites; affirmed by the Federal Circuit on appeal.
• ADREA v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. et al. (S.D.N.Y.): Won a jury verdict of patent infringement and no invalidity while serving as lead trial counsel for plaintiff in a case concerning electronic books and related technologies.
• NISTAC v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al. (E.D. Mich.): Defended Honda in a patent infringement suit relating to automobile piston assemblies; the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case after the court ruled in favor of Honda on all claim construction issues.
• Analog Devices v. Knowles Electronics (D. Del., U.S.I.T.C): Obtained a finding of infringement and an exclusion order on behalf of plaintiff following a competitor’s use of patented anti-stiction technology for micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) devices.